|
These are the desired
outcomes for the Western Libraries' instruction program. The instruction
program is evolving so this list may also be expected to change in years
to come. This document was created in Fall. 1999. Last update: Fall
2006. | ||
|
GOALS |
LOWER DIVISION
STUDENTS |
UPPER DIV./ GRAD
STUDENTS |
|
|
should be able
to: |
should be able
to: |
|
|
|
|
|
The Social Aspect of
Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Understand the
role, power, |
1. Explain the
different uses of information |
1. through
4. |
|
and value of
information in |
(occupational,
intellectual, recreational, |
|
|
our
society |
etc.) |
5. Explain the
difference between |
|
|
|
information and
knowledge |
|
|
2. Describe how
scholars use information |
|
|
|
and keep
informed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Describe how
practicing professionals |
|
|
|
use information and
keep informed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Describe the uses
of information |
|
|
|
along with the
possibilities and |
|
|
|
consequences of
misuse |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Explain public
policy issues |
1. Demonstrate
knowledge of the ethics |
1. and
2 |
|
relating to the
access and |
of information use by
defining plagiarism |
|
|
use of
information |
and by explaining how
and when to give |
|
|
|
credit for
information and ideas from |
|
|
|
others by
appropriately citing sources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Demonstrate
knowledge of the concept |
3. Explain the legal,
ethical, and |
|
|
of Intellectual
Property (including copyright) |
political issues
surrounding information |
|
|
|
technology, such as
privacy, |
|
|
|
access to government
information, |
|
|
|
information overload,
equal access to |
|
|
|
information, and the
responsibility to |
|
|
|
properly credit
sources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Explain concepts
and issues related to |
|
|
|
censorship,
intellectual freedom, intellectual |
|
|
|
Property (including
copyright) and respect for different points |
|
|
|
of
view |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Organization of
Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Explain different
information |
1. Describe different
information environments |
1. through
4. |
|
environments |
|
|
|
|
2. Describe the
processes by which scholarly and |
|
|
|
popular information
is produced, |
5. Describe the
commodity nature of |
|
|
organized and
disseminated |
information: who
generates, controls, |
|
|
|
disseminates, and
uses it |
|
|
3. Describe and
distinguish between |
|
|
|
scholarly , trade,
and popular publications |
6. Explain the
concept of discourse |
|
|
|
community and that
discourse |
|
|
4. Describe and
distinguish between |
communities
independently |
|
|
primary and secondary
sources |
develop specialized
|
|
|
|
vocabularies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Identify the
stages of the scholarly |
|
|
|
publication
cycle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Demonstrate
familiarity with unique and |
|
|
|
shared concepts of
research strategies |
|
|
|
across
disciplines |
|
|
|
|
|
D. Explain how
information is |
1. Explain the major
classification systems |
1. through
6. |
|
organized in a
library |
libraries use to
organize and classify |
|
|
|
materials |
7. Explain how the
Internet differs from |
|
|
|
systems used to
organize libraries |
|
|
2. Explain the use
and identify the parts of |
|
|
|
library catalog
records |
8. Explain the use of
citation indexes, the |
|
|
|
ways in which they
differ from other |
|
|
3. Identify
appropriate reference sources |
indexes, and the
fields in which they are |
|
|
(encyclopedias,
directories, indexes, |
most
relevant |
|
|
abstracts, etc.) and
explain their utility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Define types of
databases and their |
|
|
|
organization (files,
records, etc.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Define and
distinguish between key |
|
|
|
words, subject
headings, and |
|
|
|
descriptors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Describe the
difference |
|
|
|
between controlled
vocabulary |
|
|
|
and free text
searching |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Recognize the
availability of |
1. Identify physical
and virtual service points |
1. through
2. |
|
assistance in
locating |
in Western's
libraries |
|
|
resources |
|
|
|
|
2. Find Western
Library's locally produced |
|
|
|
research
tools |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Research
Process |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Identify and
articulate |
1. Identify a
specific information need |
1. through
3. |
|
information
needs |
|
|
|
|
2. Articulate the
information need as |
|
|
|
a researchable
question |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Determine
information requirements, |
|
|
|
often through a
series of sub-questions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Identify a variety
of |
1. Use reference
tools to extract key words or |
1. and
2. |
|
information
resources |
controlled
vocabulary, such as subject headings and descriptors, appropriate to the
research topic |
|
|
|
|
3. Explain how people
and organizations |
|
|
|
can be used as
information resources |
|
|
2. Identify and use
appropriate search |
|
|
|
language which
describes broader, |
4. Explain how search
terms may vary with |
|
|
narrower and related
terms |
time and context, for
example, culture and discipline |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Develop effective
search |
1. Describe a variety
of search techniques such as |
1. through 4.
|
|
strategies |
using indexes,
advanced search, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Select categories
of information resources |
5. Demonstrate a
variety of search |
|
|
appropriate to a
specific information need |
techniques |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Outline a simple
search strategy for a |
6. Construct a
logical plan for advanced |
|
|
specific information
need |
library research in a
particular discipline |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Identify the
criteria for evaluating |
|
|
|
possible sources
(timeliness, format, |
|
|
|
importance of using
more than one kind, etc.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Select the search
strategies |
1. through
4 |
|
search
strategies |
appropriate to the
topic and |
|
|
|
discipline |
5. Use controlled
vocabulary and |
|
|
|
free text efficiently
in search strategies |
|
|
2. Use controlled
vocabulary, key words, |
for both print and
electronic sources |
|
|
author, and title
searches to locate |
|
|
|
relevant items in
print and electronic |
6. Effectively use
the campus |
|
|
resources |
information systems,
information |
|
|
|
networks, and
Internet to locate |
|
|
3. Use Boolean logic
and similar operations to |
information
appropriate to the need |
|
|
construct a
successful search |
|
|
|
|
7. Demonstrate that
different information |
|
|
4. Access the
campus |
sources and formats
require different |
|
|
information systems,
information |
searching
techniques |
|
|
networks, and
Internet to locate |
|
|
|
information
appropriate to the need |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Analyze and
interpret search |
1. Identify the
components of a citation |
1. through
3. |
|
results and select
relevant |
and differentiate
between types of |
|
|
materials to
examine |
resources cited
(books, periodical |
4. Assess the number
and quality of the |
|
|
articles, government
documents, |
citations to
determine whether the |
|
|
Internet resources,
etc.) |
search strategy must
be refined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Demonstrate how to
obtain items |
5. Use the components
of a citation to |
|
|
through several
techniques (e.g. on the |
choose those most
suitable for the |
|
|
shelf,
electronically, or via Interlibrary |
information need,
using criteria such as |
|
|
Loan) based on a
bibliographic citation |
currency, reputation
of author or |
|
|
|
source, formats,
elements of URL, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Access specific
information within |
|
|
|
resources by using
internal organizers |
|
|
|
(indexes, tables of
contents, etc.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Analyze and
critically |
1. Review information
for relevance to |
1. and
2. |
|
evaluate
information |
the
topic |
|
|
|
|
3. Skim and scan for
major ideas and |
|
|
2. List and explain
elements that may |
keywords to identify
relevant information |
|
|
help in analyzing the
reliability of the information: |
|
|
|
table of contents,
abstracts, bibliography, author |
4. Use a variety of
criteria, such as |
|
|
and publisher
credentials, editorial review process, |
author’s credentials,
reputation of the |
|
|
URL analysis, and
organization of the material |
of the publisher,
editorial review process, and provenance to assess the
objectivity |
|
|
|
and reliability of
the information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Demonstrate the
use of elements that |
|
|
|
help in analyzing the
objectivity and reliability of the information: table
of |
|
|
|
contents, abstracts,
bibliography, URL |
|
|
|
analysis and
organization of material |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Differentiate
between fact, opinion, |
|
|
|
propaganda, point of
view, and bias |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Explain that
different points of view may exist within a
discipline. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Analyze
information retrieved and |
|
|
|
determine whether the
search strategy |
|
|
|
needs
revision. |
|
|
|
|
|
L. Organize
information |
1. Organize
information from a variety of |
1. through
3. |
|
collected |
sources for practical
application (e.g. |
|
|
|
term paper, oral
presentation) |
4. Synthesize
information from a variety |
|
|
|
of
sources |
|
|
2. Summarize the
information in the |
|
|
|
student's own words;
paraphrase or |
5. Identify systems
used to organize and |
|
|
quote important facts
and details when |
retrieve ctiations (index cards,
databases, |
|
|
necessary for
accuracy or clarity |
etc.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Prepare a
bibliography and citations, |
|
|
|
demonstrating the
proper formats for |
|
|
|
citing books, journal
articles, government |
|
|
|
documents, websites,
etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Evaluate the
research |
1. Determine the
extent to which the research |
1. and
2. |
|
process |
met the defined
information need and/or satisfied |
|
|
|
the
assignment |
3. Determine the
extent to which the |
|
|
|
research process
conformed to the |
|
|
2. Explain that
information-seeking is |
standards of the
discipline |
|
|
an evolving,
non-linear process that |
|
|
|
involves making a
series of choices |
4. Describe the
criteria used to make |
|
|
|
choices at each step
of the particular |
|
|
|
process
used |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Consider whether
the reference |
|
|
|
question, strategy,
resources, or |
|
|
|
interpretation should
have been |
|
|
|
expanded, revised, or
modified |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes: 1999 Original
Authors: Robin Angeley, Jeanne Armstrong,
Margaret Fast, Robert Lopresti, Ray McInnis, Judith Segal 2006 Revision
Authors: Muriel Green, Kristin Kohles, Robert
Lopresti, Jeff Purdue, Sylvia Tag Sources:
ACRL/ Gilchrist, Debra. "To
EnABLE Information Competency: The Abilities
Model in Library Instruction." LOEX-96. Page 19-33. Oberman, Cerise, et al.
"Integrating Information Literacy Into The Curriculum." College and
Research Library News. May 1998. 59 (5) Page 347-352.
Olsen, Jan Kennedy
and Bill Coons. Unpublished paper for Work Group on
Information Competence. Association of College
& Research Libraries (ACRL). “Information Literacy Competency
Standards for Higher Education.” 2000. http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/informationliteracycompetency.htm
| ||